Book Review: The Plague by Albert Camus

Does anyone remember that time when the government put us on semi house arrest for like a year because of a disease? And it sucked?


Does anyone remember that time when the government put us on semi house arrest for like a year because of a disease? And it sucked?

Well, that’s what The Plague by Albert Camus is about, and the similarities are striking– except that the plight of the characters in the book is way worse than coronavirus, because it’s the plague instead. The kind with the rats, yes.

About the Book

Title: The Plague

Author: Albert Camus

Published: 1947

Series: (standalone)

Genre: classics, philosophy

My Rating: 4/5 stars


The Premise

Synopsis (from Goodreads) (truncated):

In Oran, a coastal town in North Africa, the plague begins as a series of portents, unheeded by the people. It gradually becomes an omnipresent reality, obliterating all traces of the past and driving its victims to almost unearthly extremes of suffering, madness, and compassion.

My Thoughts

Albert Camus’s The Plague takes place in a small town that suddenly experiences a plague outbreak and is placed in quarantine. The residents of the town are locked inside, separated from their loved ones, and consigned to a potential fate of painful disease and death with no end to the ordeal in sight.

The story is framed as an account written by an unnamed narrator intended to objectively relay the sequence of events, and we spend time following several different characters and their reactions to this senseless misfortune– their confrontations with the Absurd, so to speak.

Among these characters are Dr. Rieux, the doctor who resolves to do all in his power to fight the plague even when it seems impossible; Father Paneloux, the priest who maintains that the plague is nevertheless the divine will of God; Rambert, a journalist who wants to escape the town and reunite with his lover; Tarrou, an atheist who likens the plague to the evil in the world and resolves himself to the impossible task of causing no death through any choice of his own in the attempt to find peace and meaning; and Grand, an elderly man intent on writing a flawlessly “perfect” novel.


Though the book dragged a bit due to the cold, almost clinically detailed way in which it was written– I suppose to mimic the narrator’s intent at an impartial account– it was at the same time very interesting.

The main theme of the book, similar to much of Camus’s work, is the impossible confrontation between humans’ innate drive to find meaning and a world which offers none. The plague and the suffering it causes is senseless, despite the efforts of figures like Paneloux to rationalize it in some spiritual way.

“Do you believe in God, doctor?”

No – but what does that really mean? I’m fumbling in the dark, struggling to make something out. But I’ve long ceased finding that original.”

But even though there is a theme of humanity’s impotence in the face of the universe’s shrouded will, there is also a strong theme of hope— despite it all, the characters continue to work to save the lives of those they can and prevent further spread of the plague.

And throughout the course of the novel, we come to realize that the plague motif is being used to represent not just this specific disease, but the predicament of humanity in general. As the old man says towards the end of the book, quite plainly: “But what does it mean, the plague? It’s life, that’s all.”

The most memorable part of the book for me was Tarrou’s speech to Rieux about how he views humanity and his personal quest to “not be the mortal enemy of anyone”:

I only know that one must do what one can to cease being plague-stricken, and that’s the only way in which we can hope for some peace or, failing that, a decent death. This, and only this, can bring relief to men, and, if not save them, at least do them the least harm possible and even, sometimes a little good.”


The Verdict

Overall I enjoyed this book and would recommend it– though I would probably advise you to read The Stranger first since this book makes more sense if you have a sense of Camus’s messaging first.

Have you read The Plague by Albert Camus? If so, what did you think of it? Feel free to leave a comment!

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to Frappes & Fiction. I post about the books I read (even if they’re not fiction), the books I think YOU should read, and anything else on my mind.

(I’m also on social media!)


7 comments on “Book Review: The Plague by Albert Camus”

  1. Yes I read it. In my case it was the other way around, first I read The Plague, then The Stranger. It was quite some time ago but I still remember them as very good readings, maybe it’s time to revisit them. Thanks for commenting about!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. This book is one of my favourite ones. I read it for the first time about fifteen years ago, before it became popular again because of the pandemic. It had a very strong impact on me because of its humanist message.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I read this book for the first time when I was twenty years old, which was more than five decades ago. I still have the paperback copy of that book, which has aged pages and passages that I noted and reread for years. I can still feel my entire self shaking after that first reading. After all, this book contradicted everything I believed to be true about life at the time, and I was a student at a Catholic seminary. Over the past month, I have questioned if it will still be relevant and whether it has something to say about our isolation.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. The Plague is worth reading because it is so extremely topical and because Camus is a great, effective writer. Yet many may not feel ready for a book that hits too close to home.

    Nonetheless, it is useful, and helpful, to see the similarities and differences between the fictional French port of Oran in the real Algeria and today’s pandemic.

    Differences: In the book, the town is quarantined (and only the town is affected, not other towns or countries) and the most useful way of communicating is by telegram (not even the phone or mail available to them, let alone television or internet which are not in the setting of the book). People are not separated until they become sick, so they converse in jobs, restaurants, and churches together. The plague is bubonic plague, rather than a coronavirus, although it eventually becomes a pneumatic plague. The main recourse is to wait and hope not to get the plague–and the waiting takes months. (Well, that part is all too similar.)

    Similarities: the nonstop, exhausting work of the doctors and those who take of the sick and dying, the effort/hope to save everyone, dubiousness about regulations, quarantine camps & hospitals, and especially, the exhausted despair of the townspeople because of the uncertainty about when the plague and resulting quarantine will end. The focus on the weekly, then daily number of infections and whether they are rising and falling is also familiar.

    While this sounds dreary, Camus offers a very humane take with his focus on a few key characters. The way in which the townspeople go through different stages of disbelief, rebellion, grief, and dull waiting will also certainly resonate with readers today.

    Highly recommended, especially for those interested in factually-accurate historically-relevant fiction.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.